|
All-Time High Scores
Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed books.
|
The Wisdom Of Crowds |
||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
||||||||||||
New Yorker business columnist James Surowiecki offers an appealingly simple if somewhat counterintuitive thesis: that large groups of people are smarter than an elite few, no matter how brilliant--better at solving problems, fostering innovation, coming to wise decisions, even predicting the future. Surowiecki ranges across fields as diverse as popular culture, psychology, ant biology, economic behaviorism, artificial intelligence, military history and political theory to show just how this principle operates in the real world. [Doubleday]
Doubleday, 320 pages
05/25/2004
$24.95
ISBN: 0385503865
Nonfiction
Business & Professional
Current Events & Politics
Social Sciences
All reviews are classified as one of five grades: Outstanding (4 points), Favorable (3), Mixed (2), Unfavorable (1) and Terrible (0). To calculate the Metascore, we divide total points achieved by the total points possible (i.e., 4 x the number of reviews), with the resulting percentage (multiplied by 100) being the Metascore. Learn more...
The average user rating for this book is 7.2 (out of 10) based on 5 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.
Steve W gave it a6:
the first half is filled with insightful background into the mechanics of "wisdom of crowds", but the second half - devoted entirely to case studies - is too anecdotal and unattached to the earlier theory. Would've been better if the author tied experience with theory more closely together.
jeff d gave it a10:
Great book!
Brett R. gave it a4:
The author makes his point in an entertaining and easy-to-read fashion, but ultimately does not prove it. He does know how to distinguish between studies whose results are actually statistically significant, and those who simply conclude a premise that is convenient for him to use. The book is rambling and repetetive, taking pages and pages to make a point for which only a paragraph is necessary. The entire idea should have remained a newspaper article, at most.
Jim N gave it an8:
Is easy to say I've been reading better books such as "Bowling Alone" about social trends and social intercourse but Surowiecki is well worth reading. Good on'ya. This book is our book-of-the-month for our reading club.

| Return to top of page |

Popular on CBS sites: MLB | Spore | iPhone 3G | Paris Hilton | Antivirus Software | GPS | Recipes | Shwayze | NFL
About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise
© 2008 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use